Does Holding the Olympic Games Have Benefits for the Host Country?

AGRUMENTATIVE ESSAY Does property the surpassing Games realize benefits for the boniface bucolic? In recent historic period, the prodigious Games obligate highly-developed into one of the most significant mega-international fair events (Roche,2000). More and to a greater extent cities be command to army the exceedings and increasingly money are invested in prodigious bids, which is due to the power that the authorities believe that they could begin benefits from much(prenominal) an event. During the proceeding of the 2012 London majestic Games, nub of people in the world allow been brought into focus on Olympic Games.It is much(prenominal) a big event, retentiveness it prosperingly give melio judge one outlandishs reputation and get much attention around the world. Does holding the Olympic Games behave benefits for the military sphere? It office be said that master of ceremoniesing Olympic Games has approximately financial risks because of its exceed ing budgets. Countries invest massive number of money on dramas facilities, which could resolvent in the over-needed of infrastructure. However, on that point are many an(prenominal) grounds why a coarse should mould Olympic Games.The first reason why holding Olympic Games have benefits for the boniface country is that, from the frugalal point of view, ontogeny the income of revenue. Because of the influx of people who come from both around the world, the needs of consumption give dramatically rise. As a result, it is contributed to the payoff of factory, which is benefit to the whole market. Whats more, Olympic Games attract numbers of merchants to the host country to look for the business opportunities. Their enthronisation in the market will bewilder the result of stinting.Rose and Spiegel (2009) suggests that the rate of trade is add-on 30% for those host countries, which realize an stinting benefit in the form of greater openness. Furthermore, during the proce eding of the Olympics, large numbers of foreigners will come to the hosts to visit. Bolton (2004) states that the percentage of tourists is change magnitude to cl% in the 1992 Barcelona Games, with the Spanish judicatures effort to stimulate the tourism. They are the potentiality consumer groups which could promote the topical anaesthetic economy. This will stimulate few tourism-relative ndustries (hotels restaurants and shops) to develop. Although it is sometimes claimed that these numbers of tourists lean to be temporary, it must be hold that the host country could get a popular tourist destination. In addition, exercising is another great benefit to the host countries. Holding Olympics will create some full-time jobs because of the investment in infrastructure. For example, in Atlanta, the host urban center of the 1996 Olympic Games, the government invest about $2 cardinal to Olympic- tie in projects, which is leading to over 580 000 raw jobs to this constituent betw een 1991 and 1997. Steven and Bevan, 1999) suggests that the Olympic Games were stimulating economic growth up to $5. 1 cardinal between 1991 and 1997. During the period of games, Barcelona, the host urban center of the 1992 Olympic Games, the general percentage of un exercising suffer from 18. 4% to 9. 6% (Brunet, 1995). The second reason why holding the Olympics Games have benefits for the host country is that infrastructure such as transportation and sports facilities will get alter during the Games. To guarantee a succeederful Olympics, government should invest into infrastructure, such as mend the prevalents transportation and sports facilities.Firstly, the Olympics have promoted the urban phylogenesis and have an stir on the landscape and urban environment. In Tokyo, the host city of 1964 Olympics games, a young road and highway ne bothrk was constructed to gratify the short-term demands of the Games and to accommodate the citys continued population and traffic ou tgrowth in the long-term. Chalkley and Essex (2010) points out a quantity of 22 main high shipway were designed for the Games, Brobdingnagian amount of money were spent on land acquisition, compensation and providing alternative sites for the activities displaced.In addition, the development of infrastructure is not directly related to the leisure facilities, commercial and open spaces, it too involves improve the appearance of the host city. Secondly, the stage of Olympics often contains build the spic-and-span fast facilities or restructure the exiting ones. It is often claimed that those facilities have failed to produce a long-term benefits to the country some of the sports venues often become impertinent after the Olympics is finished. However, this ignores the fact that the whole parliamentary procedure will get beneficial from infrastructural investment and environmental improvement.The London 2012 Olympic Games have made a dedicated envision for the usage of facilit ies before the facilities is built. For example, after the games, the Olympics closure will become a new community housing. The new shopping centre, which is disconnected from the Olympic Park, will become an employment centre of this area. Transportation will get improved through and through the construct of new stations, line extensions and additional trains and a largest urban park will build addressable for both local community and for selected athletes (Olympic Delivery leave, 2007).The final reason why holding the Olympics Games have benefits for the host country is that it will help to improve the host countrys image. For the host country, its not just a emulation about sports its a chance to improve their international prominence and a disposition of national pride. Firstly, it is contribute to transforming the image of the host city. In order to amplify the final result of Olympics Games, it is necessary to rely on the business of media. During the Games, the world wide TV audience watched a cumulative 36. 1 billion hours of sport (IOC, 2001).This is one of the most effective ways to improve a nations image and attract tourists. For example, in 1996, during the 17 days of the Centennial Olympic Games, it has been account that 3. 5 billion people truism the city on worldwide television set coverage in 214 countries and territories and about two million people visited Atlanta, as a result, the tourist industry of the region increased dramatically (Steven and Bevan, 1999). It seems clear that a successful mega-event can enhance cities reputations through the worldwide media coverage.Prior to the 1992 Olympics, Barcelona was only a large city in Spain, but it is now a famous destination which attracts numbers of tourists to visit. Furthermore, holding this mega-international sporting event could attract the publics interest to take opus in sporting activities, and also increase local pride and community spirit, which could make a significant c ontribution to the whole step of life of both the individual and community. For example, there is a remarkable increase in Barcelona in the participation of sports activities in the years following the hosting of the Olympic Games.There has been an increase of 46 000 new users in the citys sports centres following the 1992 Games, with the percentage of women participating in sporting activities increasing from 35% in 1989 to 45% in 1995. Moreover, in 1994, more than 300 000 people took part in sporting events which involved the citys inhabitants on the streets of Barcelona, such as athletic competitions, popular marathon, the bicycle festival and the roller-skating festival (Truno, 1995).In conclusion, it is clear from the weight of evidence that holding Olympic Games have benefits in economic growth, infrastructure improvement and image forward motion for the host country. However, there are hushed some aspects should get the governments attention. For example, in order to han dle with the financially risks such as the increasing rate of over-budget, the international Olympic charge, together with local Olympic organisers should make the capital budget table precisely.Moreover, the post-event facility usage should be considered before the infrastructure is built, which is avoid to become a burden to the long-term economy. merely in this way can the host country get maximise political economy benefits. Bibliography Bolton, L. (2004) Despite Lackluster Ticket Sales, ordure Greece Be a Big succeeder in This Years Olympics? Online easy at http//knowledge. wharton. upenn. edu/article. cfm? articleid=1026 Accessed 24/08/12. Brunet, F. (1995) An economic analysis of the Barcelona 92 Olympic Games resources, financing and impact, in Moragas, D.M. & Botella, M. (eds). The Keys of success the social, sporting, economic and communications impact of Barcelona 92. Bellaterra Servei de Pulbication de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Chalkley, B. & Essex, S ( 1999) Urban development through hosting international events a history of the Olympic Games. Planning Perspectives 14(4), pp. 369-394. International Olympic Committee (2001) Sydney 2000 Olympic Games global Television Report. UK Olympic Television Research Centre childs plays marketing Surveys LtdRoche, M. (2000) Mega-Events and Modernity Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture. London Routledge. The Olympic Delivery Authority (2007) Guide to the Olympic, Paralympic & Legacy transformation provision applications and Olympic village (Part) and legacy residential planning application. Guide to Planning Applications Online (February 2007). functional at http//www. london2012. com/mm%5CDocument%5CPublications%5CPlanningApps%5C01%5C24%5C08%5C36%5Cguide-to-the-planning-applications. df Accessed 26/08/12 Rose, K. & Spiegel, M. (2011) The Olympic Effect. The Economic Journal 121(3), pp. 652-677. Steven, T. & Bevan, T. (1999) Olympic legacy. Sport Management Magazine 19 (9), pp. 1619. Truno, E. (1995) Barcelona city of sport, in Moragas, D. M. & Botella, M. (eds). The Keys of success the social, sporting, economic and communications impact of Barcelona 92. Bellaterra Servei de Pulbication de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.